|
Sex And HIV: Behaviour-Change Trial Shows No Link
The East African (Nairobi)
March 17, 2003
Posted to the web March 19, 2003
By Paul Redfern, Special Correspondent
Nairobi
A UK funded trial aimed at reducing the spread of Aids in Uganda by
modifying sexual behaviour appears to have had little discernible
effect.
The trial, carried out on around 15,000 people in the Masaka region,
involved distributing condoms, treating around 12,000 victims of
sexually transmitted diseases and counselling.
However, while the trial led to a marked change in sexual behavioural
patterns, with the proportion reporting causal sexual partners falling
from around 35 per cent to 15 per cent, there was no noticeable fall
in the number of new cases of HIV infection, although there was a
significant reduction in sexually transmitted diseases such as
syphilis and gonorrhoea.
The trial results, which were reported in the British medical journal
The Lancet, have already aroused some controversy.
The team leader of the trial, Dr Anatoli Kamalai, acknowledged that
there was "no measurable reduction" in HIV incidence with "no hint of
even a small effect."
But the research team's view is that the spread of HIV was already
declining in the area and the trial might not have been big enough to
detect any additional change.
There is, however, another view which has recently been put forward
which claims that inadequately sterilised needles across Africa have
led to a greater rate of HIV infection than sexual contact.
It is a view put forward by a mainly American group of scientists,
including Dr David Gisselquist, who told the Times of London that
"Results from the Masaka study add to the already long list of
findings from other studies that don't fit the hypothesis that most
HIV in African adults is from sexual transmission.
"These results from Masaka are similar to results published earlier
from a similar study in Rakai, Uganda, where interventions that
reduced STD prevalence had no impact on HIV incidence." However, such
a view is by no means mainstream in the latest thinking on the spread
of HIV in Africa.
Most scientific research still believes that HIV is mainly spread by
sexual transmission and that people suffering from STDs are
particularly prone.
The trial was the first systematic attempt on a large scale to assess
whether modifying sexual behaviour and better management of other
sexual diseases could cut the transmission of HIV in Africa.
In a commentary in The Lancet, Judith Stephenson and Frances Cowan of
the Royal Free and University College Medical School in London
acknowledged that "many people will be disappointed by the lack of
reduction in HIV incidence, despite an apparently appropriate
intervention that reduced other STDs and was implemented on a huge
scale with great care and commitment."
The two researchers suggest that it might have been "the right trial
and the wrong time" - when HIV incidence was falling and when there
were already substantial reductions in risk behaviour.
Copyright © 2003 The East African. All rights reserved. Distributed
by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com).
 http://allafrica.com/stories/200303190482.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200303190482.htmlT
 Homepage:: http://www.virusmyth.com
Please Don't Feed the Trolls
Wikipedia defines an Internet Troll as: "either a person who sends messages on the Internet hoping to entice other users into angry or fruitless responses, or a message sent by such a person." San Diego IMC strives to provide both a grassroots media resource as well as a forum for people to contribute to a meaningful discussion about local issues. Please, when posting comments, be respectful of others and ignore those trying to interrupt or discourage meaningful discourse. Thank you.
-- San Diego Indymedia volunteers
|
|
Download this article in pdf format >>
Make a quick comment on this article>>
|
At last! Someone besides me is posting material challenging the conventional wisdom about HIV and AIDS to the IMC. It's about time the Left started looking more closely at the lies underpinning the HIV/AIDS model instead of unquestioningly accepting the propaganda of the pharmaceutical industry and its "kept" scientists on this issue.
Mark Gabrish Conlan
 e-mail:: mgconlan@earthlink.net
Bravo Indie media SD for covering the AIDS dissident/rethinkers/denialist movement!!
TerryD
e-mail:: terrd@hotmail.com
For years a small but vocal group of activists who claim that HIV is harmless and AIDS is caused not by a virus but by "lifestyle factors" -- chiefly recreational and medical drug use. Either the medical establishment is misguided or murderous for advocating the use of toxic anti-HIV drugs.
The "AIDS dissident" movement has been around for well over a decade. For the most part, it has remained on the fringe, wearing the disdain of mainstream scientists and AIDS activists as a badge of pride.
But in past years the movement has been challenged from within -- by former believers who, in keeping with dissident orthodoxy, had scorned and avoided recently developed AIDS therapies.
Some of them have themselves gotten sick with AIDS. They say their belief that HIV couldn't hurt them put their lives and the lives of their lovers at risk. One even goes so far as to compare his former movement to a cult.
Sean Current
All sorts of ideas should be explored and debated--but the direct translation of casual speculation and debating points into the medical care of patients with life-threatening illness, which is strongly encouraged by many of the "dissidents" is cause for concern.
John James
The problem is not unorthodox ideas, but their immediate translation into personal medical advice, usually to tell patients to reject all medical care for HIV or AIDS, as well as suggesting that safer sex and other infection- control precautions can be ignored. So for each of the seven points, we include the corresponding action item. We are continually amazed at how casually sheer speculation gets translated into life-and-death decisions.
HIV is harmless (or does not exist), and AIDS is not contagious--so sexual and other precautions are unnecessary.
The HIV test is unreliable--so don't get tested.
AIDS drugs are poisons, pushed by doctors corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry--so don't take any of them, no matter what your doctor says--or don't go to a doctor at all, especially if you feel well.
Viral load and CD4 tests are useless--so don't use them.
AIDS deaths would have gone down anyway, even without new treatments--so you don't need medical care.
AIDS is over, or never existed, or only affected small risk groups--so there is no important need for medical research on AIDS or HIV, or for AIDS services.
The free speech of dissenters has been suppressed--so you can't believe anything you hear.
jj
|
Stories contributed to this site are licensed under the
Creative Commons Non Commercial - Share Alike - By Attribution license
unless otherwise specified by the author.
|
