Fake Opposition fools most of the people most of the time

I just finished listening to Reynolds + Jenkins. I wish MR had kept things on a more earthly plane, if you know what I mean, but that was nothing compared to Jenkins' presentation.

Q: What kind of 911 'truth' (opinion-)'leader' could so blithely and glibly and now-you-see-it-now-you-don't quickly have glossed over the possibility that the Pentagon video (frame) which shows that it was NOT a 757 that hit the Pentagon might be fake?

A: A fake 911 truther!

(Ken does this about 4.5 min from the end of this video or about 1.5 min into this 1.4M MP3 audio of the last 6 minutes.)

Consider:

If the video is real, the govt has lied to us about 9/11. If the video is fake, the govt has lied to us about 9/11. Either way, that 1 frame from the video hoists the lying government by its own petard! THIS IS A *HUGE* HEADLINE, FOLKS!!!

Yet time and time again, various 'respected' presenters at these '911truth' (aka 911pravda) gatherings bury the big headline as surely as does the now-thoroughly-discredited NY Times (9/11, Iraqi WMDs, 2004 debate Bush back bulge image, domestic spying [for a year they sat on that], etc, etc, etc) and the rest of the MSM.

It was slick of Ken to position the discarding of this hugely meaningful evidence smack dab between the blue-tarp "evidence" and 16' hole "evidence" he was publicly discarding in a well-received manner, even as he was admonishing 911 truthers to not talk about things we can't be sure of...

Fee Fi Fo Fum. To me, by his presentation, Ken Jenkins definitely smells like yet another wolf in sheepdog's clothing, working hard to try to get us to disregard government-lie-killing 9/11 evidence.


dot-connector
Homepage::