Ravenaeus | 26.02.2005 11:04

Less "circumstancial" evidence has been used in court to convict "supposed" terrorists, much less with regard to associations, organizational connections, and actual pre-event statements of intent....

BushCo: The Real 911 Criminals
by Ravenaeus • Saturday February 26, 2005 at 01:42 PM
 ravenaeus@aol.com

I know. You have heard this stuff before, right? Wrong! I am going to tie a string of circumstantial evidence together that would hold up in a court of law to convict them, the whole administration of fraud, conspiracy, and international terrorism...followed closely by violation of the Geneva Convention, Article 51: UN Charter (which was used to convict Nazis), and numerous other international treaties and agreements.... Ravenaeus February 17, 2005

To understand my statement, you have to return to the good old days when Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush were presidents of the US. Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and most of the current appointees, associates, and consultants of BushCo 2000-2004 were with the Reagan and Bush 1st terms of office in one position or another. Rummy the Dummy was seen shaking hands with our great Iraqi adversary at the behest of R. Reagan in 1983 (when we supplied him with the chemical weapons used on Iran and the Kurds).

The Neo-Cons had their ideas already on the table at that time, but were reprimanded and told to "tone it down". More plainly packaged after the fall of the Soviets, this re-emerged, pick a name... "Defense Planning Guide", "The Wolfowitz Doctrine", or the "American Defense Plan" all were working titles that outlined the way in which the US could become the "dominating power of the globe." In all three documents, it was clearly stated that the US could and should forego all previous agreements and treaties and partnerships, instead using its military strength to intimidate and dominate key regions of the world. The idea was that unilateral action, pre-emptive action, and ignoring treaties/conventions would intimidate other nations into falling in line with the US economic policies and that the true empirical designs would be ignored.

The last embodiment of these Neo-Cons, who are all part of BushCo, was the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Cheney the Chump, Rummy the Dummy, and War-mongering Wolfowitz were all part of this association along with many others now serving in key positions within the US government and coordinating NGOs. The PNAC, in 2000, deliberately described the actions or "events" that would be needed to mold the general opinion of the US citizenry to follow their desired goals. Their official statement called for "a major catastrophe, like a new Pearl Harbor...in order to bring changes in the views of the American people." The idea was to generate general fear of attack, create an enemy that was real or "imagined" and to mold the public opinion in order to finally obtain the goals they had set aside from 1980-1992.

There is clear evidence that as far back as the Reagan presidency, that the Neo-Cons, and specifically Paul Wolfowitz desired military control over many regions in the Arab states, more importantly to secure "oil manufacturing". By 1998, the desire to get into place the pipeline in Afghanistan was also in play. Specifically...Syria, Iraq, and Iran were mentioned as goals for coup, internal destabilization, and/or military intervention/take-over. It is also a fact, stated by Cheney the Chump in public, that "the oil in the Middle-East is a definite goal." There is also more than adequate evidence that the Bush family as well as many others within the congress, senate, and the BushCo administration had very close contact with the Bin Ladin family and many associations have been found between the CIA and those who "supposedly" took part in the 911 hijackings, many of which are actually alive and well in Saudi Arabia as I write...

Which, by the way, there is also no coincidence that Bush 1st, ran the CIA at the time of the initial drug trade for arms or that all the individuals (including senators and many of the congressmen) connected are part of one or all of the following groups: PNAC, Center for International Development, or Haliburton. In 1996, "Shock and Awe" was written and released in a booklet, stating that inflicting massive damage, to terrorize into submission, to intimidate into compliance would be the future of the US foreign policy and key to accomplishing their goals. Also, that the need for associations, treaty organizations, the UN, and conventions would be superceded by the use of military dominance for desired effect. I would point out here that this was called, "Blitzkrieg" by the Nazis.

Here I would refer you to my articles from June of 2004 through today...there are too many to list really. I lay out the case, connections, and real information throughout. By reading all of the articles you also will see the connections plainly. (  http://journals.aol.com/ravenaeus/RantsandRaves/ view older entries)

Now, I will quote Rummy the Dummy and Dubya Bush of OZ. Rummy the Dummy, in Parade Magazine stated unequivocally that a missile hit the Pentagon. Dubya Bush of OZ first stated that he knew about the attacks that hadn't happened "before I went into the room" and then he stated that the "first thing I hear was when Card came into the room and told me." So which was it? Rummy the Dummy was heard saying that the Pentagon would be next after the WTC was hit. Was that "precognition" or "foreknowledge" on Rummy's part? Was it also coincidence that Bush the 1st and many others of their PNAC were meeting with Bin Ladin's family at exactly the same time these events occurred? And, these "Saudis" were allowed to fly out of the US without any questioning while everyone else was "grounded" around the world.

I will point out also that Osama Bin Ladin is a dialyses patient and I wonder just how can he be hold up in a cave for months? I would also point out that the "official CIA video" of his confession has an individual who looks suspiciously very different than other pictures (his nose, beard, eyes). I would also call into question the fact that many of the hijackers are alive and well in Saudi Arabia not dead with their planes. I will also point out that all those involved were connected to the Bush family, Bin Ladin family, and/or CIA operations. Also, the Anthrax was an American strain, manufactured in a joint CIA-Army base in Maryland and was stated as such by English research company, so who had access to it? Sure stopped all the questions about the election frauds of 2000 and prevented anyone hearing the results of international and independent investigations that found criminal activities didn't it? I also want to know how these names/photos were available within hours of the initial events and why we have no footage of these individuals in the airports where they boarded these planes and how the "conglomerate media" knew this was conducted by "Bin Ladin" within an hour and a half?

Oh, and how did those on flight 93 use cell phones that don't work in flight? I still call into question the finding of a passport two blocks from WTC when only a partial landing gear survived the impact of WTC2. I also want to know where the plane, bodies, fuel, and debris went when the "plane" hit the Pentagon, and why the CIA were immediately available (within minutes) to confiscate all video taken by surrounding security cameras. I want to know why reliable witnesses that saw the rockets that hit the plane in Pennsylvania are no longer quoted. I also want to know where the "black boxes" that were found by the firemen (who were shown on TV stating this) went to.

 http://911research.wtc7.net/ good site without "fake" or "retouched" videos and evidence that many of the "perpetrators" of 911 are alive and well.....

 http://www.thewebfairy.com/911 for real videos taken from legit sources.

Recommended reading/research: Norman Mailer, Mark Crispin Miler, Benjamin Barber, Zia Mian, Jody Williams, Mark Darmer, Richard Clarke (former BushCo Adv.), Paul O'Niel, Robert Jensen, Noam Chomsky, Scott Ritter, William Hartung, Tariq Ali, Greg Palast, Max Wolff, Chalmers Johnson, Michael Klare,

Web sites: Veterans For Peace, Democracy Now, Global Exchange,  http://www.linktv.org, GuardianUnlimited online, Le Monde online....

During the trials in Nuremberg, a Nazi on trial stated, that when you convince the people they are being attacked, create fear, call those who call for peace or who are dissenters "traitors", the whole nation will fall in line with the leaders, will go to war, and will be controllable. This works in any nation.

The results? One teen assaulted by off duty "homeland security officer" and another shot in the head, no charges, no investigation; creation of two unconstitutional laws, the Homeland Security and Patriot Acts; Defense Attorneys are charged, convicted, and threatened for defending their clients against unlawful detention; high school visited by Secret Service because band played song by Bob Dylan that supposedly "was threat to Pres. Bush,"; protestors/dissenters threatened, detained, interrogated unlawfully and without cause because of inaction of two unconstitutional laws. Intellectual dissenters are being purged from academic programs nationwide. We have four, large and very permanent, bases in Iraq and three built along the shiny, new pipeline in Afghanistan.

Oh, Alberto Gonzales, appointed AG of US, says "Geneva Conventions" are obsolete and quaint. This is the same thing that many were also charged with in the Hague. The fact that the three bases in Afghanistan are built on the pipeline and that four, huge and permanent bases are being built in Iraq should leave no doubts

The statements, both written and oral, previous to the events of 911 and subsequent actions by the BushCo administration, the connections to not only the Bin Ladin family but also the CIA and the operatives that were involved in the "terrorist" attack on 911, the fact that many of the "terrorists" are alive and well, the continuous violations of international agreements and conventions and treaties, and the long string of connecting statements, plans of intent, and criminal activities are more than sufficient to state what many are thinking but afraid to openly address. BushCo could be convicted in court based on the circumstantial evidence, chain of evidence, and personal connections to people, previous written intent, and subsequent activity....

e-mail:: ravenaeus@aol.com
Homepage:: http://journals.aol.com/ravenaeus/RantsandRaves/