san diego free press san diego free press radioActive sanDiego Public Access free radio san diego 1069fm








Search:

with images
with audio
with video

Read this story in English | Add a translation >>

At least one more grand jury subpeona has been served.

On Tuesday July 19th Nicole Fink was served with a subpoena to appear and testify before the grand jury in San Diego August 2, 2005 at 10:00am. She is a local activist that was an organizer with Compassion for Farm Animals at the time of the Rod Coronado lecture.

It is certain that there are more subpoenas to be served so everyone please stay alert.



Please Don't Feed the Trolls

Wikipedia defines an Internet Troll as: "either a person who sends messages on the Internet hoping to entice other users into angry or fruitless responses, or a message sent by such a person." San Diego IMC strives to provide both a grassroots media resource as well as a forum for people to contribute to a meaningful discussion about local issues. Please, when posting comments, be respectful of others and ignore those trying to interrupt or discourage meaningful discourse. Thank you.

-- San Diego Indymedia volunteers
  Download this article in pdf format >>

  Make a quick comment on this article>>


if an agent knocks

21.07.2005 14:21


if an agent knocks:

 http://security.resist.ca/personal/pdfs/IfanAgentKnocks.pdf

know your rights:

 http://www.nlg.org/resources/know_your_rights.htm

from earlier post:
 http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/109378.shtml

This information comes from a lawyer...

QUESTION:

if people come to one's door to serve a Grand Jury subpoena (to
testify), and the subpoena is for somebody else besides the person who
answers the door, what is the person who answers the door obligated to
say or do?

ANSWER:

Assuming California State Service rules apply, may be served by any person other than defendant. Holiness Church v. Metropolitan Church Assn. (1910) 12. Cal.App. 445, 448.

My be served only on person to be served. Holiness Church v. Metropolitan Church Assn. (1910) 12. Cal.App. 445, 448.

Person always has right of privacy not to answer door or say anything. Opposite of George Orwell philosophy of many law enforcement agents.

QUESTION:

if there person the subpoena is for is in the house, is the
person answering the door obligated to tell the person they need to come
to the door for a subpoena?

ANSWER:

NO (See U.S. Constitution.)

QUESTION:

if the person is not there does the person
answering have to tell the people serving the subpoena this (they are
likely FBI agents, or have agents with them)?

ANSWER:

NO (See U.S. Constitution.)

QUESTION:

if the person is
traveling or does not live there anymore, does the person answering the
door have to let them know this?

ANSWER:

NO (See U.S. Constitution.)

QUESTION:

also, if FBI agents come to the door, knock and announce themselves, but
do not say they have a warrant, is a person obligated to answer the door
or respond?

ANSWER:

NO (See U.S. Constitution.)

QUESTION:

(there seems to be grand jury subpoenas going around in san diego this
morning, and this is a pertinent question for those whose houses have
not been visited yet, or or will be visited later when they are home if
they aren't now. one account already posted here:

 http://www.sdimc.org/ , and it's very, very certain there are more
subpoenas to be issued).

ANSWER:

THE CAVEAT IS DO NOT LIE. DON'T GIVE FALSE INFO. BE RESPECTFUL. GET A WITNESS AND VIDEO CAMERA AND RECORD EVERYTHING. "NO"!!! (See U.S. Constitution.)


stop the new COINTELPRO





Stories contributed to this site are licensed under the
Creative Commons Non Commercial - Share Alike - By Attribution license
unless otherwise specified by the author.